Oh...now that is irksome indeed.
Apparently someone has published a defense (in an academic journal, no less) of the article, 'Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: truth, power and fascism', which I wrote about not all that long ago.
That's not the irksome bit. What bothers me is that in taking issue with the the 'ill-informed, reactionary responses' to the article in question (in the words of he who has taken it upon himself to defend the original authors), my own carefully crafted blog posting and article are not even mentioned.
What, wasn't I being ill-informed, reactionary or 'micro-fascist' enough? How disappointing.
Still, the new article (and a whole bunch of well-informed responses to it) can be found here at badscience.